‘Say Sorry!’: Videos Capture White Man Who Nearly Got Away with Furious Racist Rant Against Popeyes Patrons

A white Popeyes patron was shown yelling the n-word at least five times in a racist rant that reportedly ended with the man beaten, forced to apologize and stripped of his chicken sandwich.

Twitter user @ayeblizzy shared video Tuesday of the incident luring many customers in line at the restaurant to start recording, and in one day the 45-second footage attracted more than 689,000 views.

“Racists love chicken too,” the Morgan State University alum tweeted with the video.

The incident followed the national chain’s second roll-out Sunday of the spicy chicken sandwich, which is a menu addition that first triggered a nationwide shortage at the chain and prompted several fights and traffic backups from customers wanting to get their hands on the sandwiches.

Although it’s unclear what sent the unidentified white man into a profanity-laced rage in the recent incident, the footage started with him yelling “f–k you” and bating the person he was talking to feet away from where a child was standing at the restaurant.

“Come on n—-r,” the angry customer yelled repeatedly.

He went on to ask: “What the f–k is your Goddamn problem? Huh? You want to be a motherf—-r man? You want me to f–king kick your f–king ass, you piece of s–t?”

The footage showed glimpses of the hooded man the enraged customer was directing the obscenities at.

“You’d better not touch me…” the otherwise quiet man responded.

“You’re right I won’t. You’re right, n—-r…” the angry customer shouted. “Shut the f–k up.”

He then grabbed his food, balled one of his fists and jumped at the hooded man before walking out of the restaurant shouting other obscenities.

“Get the f–k out of my way,” he yelled at bystanders before that video cut off.

Another person recording, however followed the enraged man outside of the restaurant and a Twitter user who goes by @brandolucianoo
tweeted added footage Tuesday. It attracted more than 253,000 views.

“Who you calling a n—a, n—a,” someone in the video could be heard asking.

The man was slumped over on the ground taking blows to the body.

“They whoopin him,” someone said.

Multiple people were pictured in the blurry 22-second video laughing and cheering on the person beating the Popeyes patron.

“Smack him,” someone yelled.

“You in my hood, cuz,” another person told the man.

At one point in the video, the words “They rl took the sandwich from bra tho 😂😭😭” appeared on the footage. 

“Say sorry! Say it right now,” someone could be heard screaming at the man just before the footage cut off.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top