Brooklyn Man Wrongfully Convicted of Murder Is Freed After 26 Years in Prison After Key Witness Admits to Lying

A Brooklyn man who spent 26 years in prison on a false murder conviction walked out of court a free man Thursday after losing nearly three decades of his life for a crime he didn’t commit.

Carlos Weeks, 46, had his conviction vacated after a key witness in the case admitted she’d lied, the New York Post reported. Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez moved to exonerate Weeks after a review of the case found the main witnesses, two sisters, were less than credible.

Carlos Weeks

Carlos Weeks was exonerated Thursday after an investigation revealed key witnesses in the case gave false testimony. (Photo: CBS New York / video screenshot)

“I just want to say I’m feeling good and happy to be out,” Weeks said upon being released, adding: “I hope Gonzalez continues with Conviction Review Unit work because there’s a lot of guys up in there that need it.”

In 1995, Weeks was convicted of murder and first-degree assault after he was accused of gunning down Frank Davis and injuring a 10-year-old girl ins a shooting outside the Tompkins Houses in Bedford-Stuyvesant. 

He was sentenced to 27 years to life in prison.

At the time, two sisters testified they were in their 12th-floor apartment when they saw Weeks fatally shoot Davis, 21. One of the sisters, Lorraine Taylor, has since recanted her statement and claims she never witnessed what had actually transpired.

Through tears, she told Conviction Review Unit investigators: “There was so much pressure” to testify, Gonzalez said.

Her sister, Carmella Taylor, has said she doesn’t remember testifying about the incident at all, nor did she recall telling authorities that Weeks was the gunman. 

Investigators found their claims “implausible” and determined the siblings had fibbed in hopes of striking a deal for a family member in an unrelated case, according to the DA. Despite this, Weeks said he feels no ill will toward the people who put him behind bars. 

“I’m great,” he said, embracing his lawyers as he exited the Brooklyn Supreme Court this week.

The New York man spent most of his years in jail fighting to prove his innocence. It was the effort of his lawyers, who took up his case in 2015, and the Legal Aid Society that helped clear his name.

“This is a happy day for Carlos and his family — a long time in coming,” said Elizabeth Felber, an attorney with the Legal Aid Society.  “But we have other clients with matters pending before the CRU.”

“We urge that office to investigate those matters promptly so that other wrongfully convicted individuals can experience the vindication that Carlos has experienced today,” she added.

Gonzalez also apologized to Weeks for his incarceration and wished the newly-freed man a “heartfelt good luck.”

“Today we continue to see why the search for the truth must continue after a case is considered closed and the conviction has been received and someone has been sent to jail,” he told reporters outside the courthouse Friday. “We have to make sure we continue to root out these miscarriages of justice.”

Watch more in the video below. 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top