‘There’s Going to Be Some Problems’: Jamie Foxx Says He Blocked Idris Elba From Landing the Role of ‘Django’ After Saying This

There’s no doubt that scoring the lead role in Quentin Tarantino‘s 2012 film “Django Unchained” was a huge accomplishment for Jamie Foxx. But before it was officially his, he faced some pretty stiff competition.

During a recently released interview at the Toronto Film Festival, Foxx, with Michael B. Jordan next to him, said Idris Elba was also up for the “Django Unchained” lead and it made him nervous.

So he tried to talk the British actor out of taking it, so he could clear the path for himself. Foxx also said Will Smith was first up for the role, but he turned it down.

“I heard that Will Smith was going to play [Django],” Foxx explained. “And I was like, ‘Will, if you [do it] you won’t be able to walk the planet Earth.’ He decided not to.”

Foxx then learned Elba was tapped, and he told him once Tarantino saw him on a horse for the audition, no one else would stand a chance. In the film, the Django character spent much of his time riding a horse.

“Then I heard it was Idris Elba, and I ran into him,” Foxx explained. “And I said, ‘I don’t give a f–k, but your beautiful black a-s riding up on a horse, there’s going to be some problems for everybody.'”

Elba eventually turned the role down, and the fact that Foxx had his own horse is what landed him the part. Then after Foxx told the story, he talked about how much he enjoyed working on the 2012 film because of the cast.

“It was amazing to work with Christoph [Waltz], to work with Samuel Jackson, Leonardo DiCaprio, it was like going to work on an all-star team,” he explained. “But what was great about Django, Quentin Tarantino wanted that black man to win. And that’s the thing that you don’t see in Hollywood … That character to this day is legendary.”

You can watch Foxx talk about Elba below at the 31:45 mark.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top