NYC Public Advocate Goes Toe-to-Toe with Ex-FBI Agent Who Criticized Pantaleo’s Firing In Eric Garner Case

New York City public advocate Jumaane Williams gave an impassioned response Monday as he debated former FBI special agent James Gagliano over the firing of former NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo.

Pantaleo, who caused the death of Eric Garner, 43, by placing him in a department-banned chokehold, was relieved of duty after a trial judge recommend his firing earlier this month. The officer’s termination was cheered by Garner’s relatives, who’ve waited five years for justice to be served.

Jumaane Williams and James Gagliano

Former public safety advocate Jumaane Williams (left) debated ex-FBI special agent James Gagliano over the NYPD’s decision to fire officer Daniel Pantaleo. (CNN / video screenshot)

Gagliano felt quite the opposite, however, and called Pantaleo’s dismissal a “glaring miscarriage of justice.”

“I look at it from the perspective of the law,” he explained on a recent CNN panel. “It’s easy to watch the video and feel passion for the [Garner] family. We’ve had his wife on here, we have had his mother on here, we’ve had his children on here.”

But “he refused to comply, his health played a role,” Gagaliano added, arguing that it was “unfair” to Pantaleo to base his firing on footage of Garner’s final moments.

Video of the State Island man’s violent arrest showed him repeatedly telling officers he was having trouble breathing. Garner suffered a heart attack in the struggle with police and later died.

“We have got to stop pretending black folks aren’t human beings,” Williams shot back at Gagliano. “So when this happens, ‘they shouldn’t have moved, they shouldn’t have this,’ I’ve seen situations where other human beings do the same thing and they don’t end up dead.”

The public advocate argued that even if the claims against Garner, who was accused of selling loose, untaxed cigarettes, were true, his alleged crime shouldn’t have been a death sentence.

“This is the only profession … where people die and we say there shouldn’t be accountability,” he added.

Moreover, Williams pointed out that Pantaleo continued to choke Garner, even though he didn’t pose a danger to anyone involved. He argued that the then-officer should’ve waited for a supervisor instead.

“I never waited for a supervisor!” Gagliano argued.

Notably, the FBI investigates its own agents when they fire their weapons in the course of duty, with the result that they are nearly always found to be justified in shooting subjects, even when they are hostage victims who are tied up.

Grabbing his fellow panelist by the shoulder, the former G-man acknowledged he knows as much about being a Black man as America as Williams knows about being a cop on patrol in a crime-ridden neighborhood.

“You never know when somebody refuses to comply, are they looking to take my life?” he argued.

Williams replied: “I also know that people in high crime areas want that crime down. There was an error made and someone died and an illegal technique was used. And there has to be accountability for that.”

Watch more in the video below.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top