Brooklyn Man Now $10M Richer Years After Being Cleared for Crime He Didn’t Commit

A New York man is nearly $10 million richer after he was cleared for a rape and robbery for which he’s continually maintained his innocence.

Mark Denny walked out of prison in December 2017 after being exonerated following an investigation by the Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office that year. The New York Post reported August 11 that it learned comptroller Scott Stringer, with little fanfare at the time, agreed to approve awarding Denny a $9.75 million settlement, thus avoiding exposure to a $50 million suit brought up in a “notice of claim” filed last year.

Innocence Project lawyer Vanessa Potkin and Mark Denny attend the fourth annual TIDAL X: Brooklyn at Barclays Center of Brooklyn on October 23, 2018, in New York. (Photo: Mike Coppola/Getty Images for TIDAL)

The suit would have been filed against the New York Police Department and the city of New York, according to documents the publication obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.

Since Denny scored the settlement, he signed a set of “general release” papers with the comptroller’s office on May 24. Because of that, he is prohibited from suing the city and holding it accountable for his arrest and imprisonment.

Back when Denny was 17, he was accused of being one of four men who robbed a Brooklyn Burger King and raped an 18-year-old female clerk. The assault occurred in December 1987 and by February 1989, Denny was sentenced to 57 years in prison when a jury found him guilty of rape, sodomy, robbery and coercion.

In 2009, the Innocence Project took on his case and brought it to the Kings County District Attorney’s Conviction Review Unit, which determined Denny was not present at Burger King that night. In a “notice of claim,” Denny said he was “targeted and framed” by over 12 NYPD detectives and alleged they secured his conviction by making up evidence and failing to check his account of what happened. Additionally, the filing accused the detectives of “intentionally refusing to investigate other obvious leads,” including testing forensic evidence gathered from the scene after the incident.

Another claim stated that because the victim, whose eyes were closed during a portion of the attack, did not initially pick Denny out of a lineup, detectives made “false representations” and used “outright suggestion to induce” the victim to point him out “at a live lineup after she failed to identify [him] in a photo lineup … as one of the perpetrators.”

As a result of the wrongful imprisonment, the filing stated Denny suffered, among other things, “physical and emotional pain and suffering, physical sickness … loss of familial relationships” as well as a hurt reputation and loss of income.

Denny has yet to comment on the settlement, but since his release from prison nearly two years ago, he’s continued the habit he said got him through his wrongful imprisonment: running. In April, he even completed the local half marathon.

“By then, I started to stress a lot and I was overwhelmed by the stigma that I was carrying of being convicted of a crime I didn’t commit,” he told Forbes of how he got into running. “As the years pass, the stigma and the psychological burden became more heavy. Running became a way of channeling energy. I started running as a form of release.”

Denny’s multi-million dollar settlement follows a recent case in Pennsylvania where John Miller was released from prison after serving a 21-year sentence for second-degree murder. Miller has always maintained he was innocent and walked free on July 21 after the local Innocence Project got involved with his case.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top