Ta-Nehisi Coates Has the Perfect Response to Mitch McConnell’s Claim That ‘No One Alive’ Should Bear Responsibility for Reparations 

Author Ta-Nehisi Coates was met with applause Wednesday after delivering powerful testimony during the first-ever congressional hearing on reparations for slavery.

Coates, 43, whose 2014 Atlantic magazine feature, “The Case for Reparations,” is credited for sparking renewed discussions around restorative justice for those impacted by the legacy of slavery, brought down the house when he challenged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) argument that the government shouldn’t pay reparations because slavery is “something that happened 150 years ago.”

Ta-Nehisi Coates

Author Ta-Nehisi Coates gave an impassioned testimony in favor of reparations Wednesday during a House Judiciary Committee hearing. (CSPAN / video screenshot)

The GOP lawmaker spoke against the issue Tuesday, calling reparations “not a good idea,” as it would be too hard to determine who’s actually eligible for compensation. He added that while America is still a work in progress, “no one currently alive was responsible for [slavery].”

In his opening remarks, Coates blew a hole through McConnell’s claims by pointing out that the U.S. was still doling out payments to the heirs of Civil War soldiers “well into this century.” He also noted that the US  government still honors treaties it signed decades ago, even though those who signed it aren’t alive today.

Coates went on to argue that by the time the enslaved were emancipated, Black folks comprised “the largest single asset in America,” one that was cultivated via “rape, torture and child trafficking.” He noted that even though slavery had been abolished, the atrocities and racism against Black Americans raged on.

“When it ended, this country could have extended its hallowed principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to all, regardless of color,” Coates said. “But America had other principles in mind. And so, for a century after the Civil War, black people were subjected to a relentless campaign of terror — a campaign that extended well into the lifetime of Majority Leader McConnell.”

The acclaimed author and journalist proceeded to rattle off a list of injustices McConnell, 77, was present for.

“He was alive for the electrocution of George Stinney,” he said. “He was alive for the blinding of Isaac Woodard. He was alive to witness kleptocracy in his native Alabama and a regime premised on electoral theft. Majority Leader McConnell cited civil rights legislation yesterday — as well he should, as he was alive to witness the harassment, jailing, and betrayal of those responsible for that legislation by a government sworn to protect them.”

Coates added that, “while emancipation dead bolted the door against the bandits of America, Jim Crow wedged the windows wide open. And that is the thing about Senator McConnell’s “something”: It was 150 years ago. And it was right now.”

Watch more in the video below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO1yqOWfjbQ

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top