New Oregon Bill Would Allow Black People to Sue Folks Who Make Frivolous 911 Calls with Racist Intent 

Oregon lawmakers approved a bill Monday aimed a preventing on racially-motivated calls to police.

The bill, which would allow victims to sue if they’ve had the police called on them for discriminatory reasons, received overwhelming approval from the state Senate, passing on a 27-to-1 vote June 4, Oregon Public Broadcasting reported. The House passed the legislation back in April.

Oregon 911 Calls

Oregon lawmakers have approved a bill aimed at cracking down on racially motivated 911 calls. (Getty Images)

Rep. Janelle Bynum (D-Clackamas), one of the bill’s chief sponsors, said the measure is meant to “shine a spotlight on an issue African-Americans have known for far too long.”

“When you get the cops called on you just for existing out in public, it sends a clear message: You don’t belong,” Bynum told the outlet via email. “We’ve seen story after story where African–Americans around the country have been targeted and had their rights violated.”

The Associated Press reported that the bill is a joint measure by Bynum, the state House’s sole Black representative, and two other Black lawmakers. The legislation comes in response to a string of publicized incidents where white people dialed police on Black folks for largely innocuous reasons, including barbecuing in the park and waiting for a friend at Starbucks.

While the bill doesn’t create criminal charges, it opens a pathway for people to sue the caller for up to $250 in damages, OPB reported. Victims must also be able to prove the caller had racist intent, and that the police were called in an effort to purposefully discriminate.

Bynum drafted the legislation after she found herself on the receiving end of such a call. The lawmaker was out canvassing door-to-door in her bid for re-election last July when a woman reported her to police, saying Bynum looked “suspicious.”

“It was just bizarre,” she told The Oregonian at the time. “It boils down to people not knowing their neighbors and people having a sense of fear in their neighborhoods, which is kind of my job to help eradicate. [But] at the end of the day, it is important for people to feel like they can talk to each other to help minimize misunderstandings.”

Bynum managed to get an apology from the woman but realized there was no system in place to hold frivolous callers accountable.

“This creates a legal pathway to justice for those of us who have to worry about getting the cops called on us for existing in public,” she said. ” I believe this bill … will hopefully lead people to think carefully before calling the police.”

Leaders in Grand Rapids, Michigan, voted on a proposed “bias crime reporting prohibition” measure in May that would make it a criminal misdemeanor to racially profile Blacks and other racial minorities by calling the police.

“Imagine what it felt like when the police rolled up on her,” Manning of the incident involving Bynum. “How that could have turned horribly wrong. We see it every day. … It’s unfortunate we even have to have a bill like this, but this is where we are at.”
 
Republican Sen. Alan Olsen was the only one to vote against the measure on Monday, arguing it could have a chilling effect on Neighborhood Watch programs and deter people from calling the police.
 
“It concerns me when we pass legislation that would stifle this group of folks protecting their neighborhood,” Olsen said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top