New Lawsuit Accuses Chicago PD of Handcuffing an 8-Year-Old Child In Freezing Rain During Botch Raid; Family Still Awaits Apology

A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday accuses the Chicago Police Department of handcuffing an 8-year-old child, then forcing him to stand in the freezing rain as police raided his family’s home earlier this year.

“I felt very afraid, terrified,” the little boy’s mother, Alberta Wilson, said during a news conference at her lawyer’s office.

Chicago Police

A new lawsuit claims 8-year-old Royal Smart was left handcuffed in the freezing rain for nearly 45 minutes as Chicago Police executed a search warrant at his home. (ABC 7 / video screenshot)

As reported by the Chicago Sun-Times, Wilson’s complaint recalls the day officers stormed her South Side home on March 15, ordering her and her family out at gunpoint. The lawsuit accuses police of using excessive force, specifically against Wilson’s son, Royal Smart.

Not only did officers aim their assault rifles at Wilson’s younger kids — ages 6, 8, and 9 — but they also spewed profanity at them.

“Once the family reached the street, police handcuffed them,” it states. “Officers handcuffed short, 8-year-old Royal for no reason for approximately 35 to 40 minutes while he stood in the street shaking from fear and cold and drenched in the freezing rain. The handcuffs were too tight, and his wrist bruised.”

The drama unfolded just after 6 a.m. when police officers arrived to execute a search warrant based on information suggesting a assault rifle belonging to one of Wilson’s children was inside the home, according to ABC7. 

The adults were handcuffed, as was Royal, who remained that way in the frigid rain until Wilson begged police to let him go.

“He was crying and complaining the handcuffs were too tight, he felt like he was about to fall,” the frustrated mother recalled. “I had to reassure him God was not going to let anything happen to us.” 

Al Hofeld Jr., an attorney for the family, said others were handcuffed for up to two hours as officers ransacked the home, even using an explosive device to blow a hole in the ceiling. They failed to find the weapon they were looking for, however.

No one was arrested and no charges were filed. Still, Wilson says police haven’t apologized for the incident.

“Even after they released him out the handcuffs, they showed no remorse,” she said. “He’s a baby. Where’s your leadership? ‘Sorry, young man. We’re sorry for placing you in handcuffs, are you OK?’ None of that was shown.”

The harrowing incident has left the family on edge, and Hofeld said the kids now suffer from symptoms of PTSD.

“In Chicago, we are still in the dark ages when it comes to policing and children,” he said, adding “Chicago police officers behave as if our children of color and their trauma is collateral damage.”

Hofeld argued that this case and others he’s filed highlight the urgent need for an overhaul in the rules and training for police when kids are involved.

Chicago’s FOX 32 reported that Wednesday’s lawsuit is the fifth involving children of color suffering PTSD from police raiding a wrong home. 

CPD hasn’t commented on the complaint but said it’s not protocol to handcuff children. The department added that at the time officers were unaware of Royal’s age.

Watch more in the video below.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top