R. Kelly Loses Sexual Abuse Suit After Not Showing Up in Court: ‘We Don’t Care About the Lawsuit’

One of the women who’ve accused R. Kelly of sexual abuse won a default judgment on Wednesday in Cook County Circuit Court after the singer and his legal team blew it off.

The accuser, known only as H.W., is one of the four women attached to Kelly’s February arrest when he was hit with 10 charges of aggravated criminal sexual abuse. She filed the civil suit just one day before that arrest.

H.W. explained that she was sexually involved with Kelly from May 1998 to May 1999 while still underage, and it began after she met him at a restaurant celebrating her 16th birthday.

“Kelly had sexual intercourse with the minor plaintiff. The defendant also engaged in oral sex with the minor plaintiff,” the suit stated. “During these repeated incidents, defendant represented to the minor plaintiff that this behavior was appropriate.”

Many years later, H.W., who’s now 36, said she realized how wrong the alleged relationship was, and she had to seek therapy for it.

“Prior to that time, (H.W.) was unable to link in her mind the acts of childhood sexual abuse by the defendant to her fragile emotional and mental state and her problems stemming from that abuse,” the suit read.

According to the Chicago Tribune, Kelly was served a court summons for the civil suit while he was still locked up in Cook County for failing to pay $161,000 in child support to his ex-wife Andrea Kelly. But he never responded to that summons.

“Robert Sylvester Kelly has failed and refused to file an appearance or answer to the complaint even though [he’s] required to do so,” wrote H.W.’s attorneys.

H.W. is seeking $50,000 in damages, which could be granted to her at a May 8 hearing, where she’ll provide additional information to Judge Moira Johnson about the alleged sexual relationship.

Darrell Johnson, Kelly’s publicist, has already responded to the victory and admitted the singer won’t be paying the civil suit any mind.

“We don’t care about the lawsuit. The lawsuit means nothing to us,” he said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top