Trump Responds to Rep. Cummings Subpoena for Financial Records With Lawsuit Claiming Black Congressman Doesn’t Have Such Authority

President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against Democratic Rep.
Elijah Cummings claiming his attempts to summon years of financial information from his businesses is an overreach of congressional power.

The filing was made in D.C. District Court Monday, April 22 and, sees plaintiffs Trump, a Republican, along with his Trump Organization business, take aim at defendants Cummings, who serves as Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and Peter Kenny, who is the Chief Investigative Counsel of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

“The Democrat Party, with its newfound control of the U.S. House of Representatives, has declared all-out political war against President Donald J. Trump,” the lawsuit said. “Subpoenas are their weapon of choice.”

Last week, Cummings subpoenaed Trump’s accountant, Mazars USA, which also handles the Trump Organization, requesting “financial statements, supporting documents, and communications about Plaintiffs over an eight-year period — mostly predating the President’s time in office.”

The suit charges that the Maryland congressman “has ignored the constitutional limits on Congress’ power to investigate” and states the subpoena of Mazars “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose.”

Additionally, Trump and his businesses are also asking for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to halt Mazars from handing over the requested information. Mazars is actually a defendant — one of the entities Trump is suing — in the president’s lawsuit.

In response to the suit, Cummings released a statement dismissing the filing.

“The President has a long history of trying to use baseless lawsuits to attack his adversaries, but there is simply no valid legal basis to interfere with this duly authorized subpoena from Congress,” the 13-term House veteran said. “This complaint reads more like political talking points than a reasoned legal brief, and it contains a litany of inaccurate information. The White House is engaged in unprecedented stonewalling on all fronts, and they have refused to produce a single document or witness to the Oversight Committee during this entire year.”

The lawsuit is the latest showing of tension between the Republican commander-in-chief and Democratic representative, a struggle that took shape shortly after Trump took office in 2017. One older example came in June 2018, when Cummings slammed the administration for separating migrant families at the border. At the time, some 2,000 children of recent undocumented immigrants were being held there away from their parents.

“If you believe people entered our country illegally, even if you believe they have no valid asylum claims in their own country, even if you believe immigration should be halted entirely, we all should be able to agree that in the United States of America, we will not intentionally separate children from their parents,” he said at the time.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top