Rep. Steve King Wants to Know Why the Term ‘White Supremacist’ Is Offensive

GOP Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) is getting blowback after questioning when the terms “white nationalist” and “white supremacist” became offensive in American culture.

“White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” King asked in an interview with The New York Times published Thursday. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?”

Steve King

Rep. Steve King has used racist language in the past and once tweeted “diversity is not our strength.” (Photo by Justin Wan, Sioux City Journal)

King responded to the Times article later that day and insisted he isn’t a white supremacist, nor is he an advocate for white nationalists.

“I want to make one thing abundantly clear: I reject those labels and the evil ideology they define,” he wrote in a statement. “Further, I condemn anyone that supports this evil and bigoted ideology, which saw in its ultimate expression the systematic murder of 6 million innocent Jewish lives.”

Dubbing himself a “nationalist,” the congressman doubled down on his defense of what he called “Western civilization’s values.”

“It’s true that like the Founding Fathers … I profoundly believe that America is the greatest tangible expression of these ideals the World has ever seen,” King added. “Under any fair political definition, I am a nationalist.”

The comments came as part of an extensive report from the newspaper detailing how King’s staunch views on immigration that mirror those of President Donald Trump. Hard-line, zero-tolerance policies aren’t the only thing two have in common, however.

The Times notes that King has used racist language in the past and supports known neo-Nazis on Twitter. He has also tweeted that “diversity isn’t out strength.”

Additionally, King once took to the House floor to unveil a model for a 12-foot border wall he designed. Trump is now demanding his own border wall, asking Democrats to fork over $5.7 billion for a steel barrier along the U.S. southern border. Dems have refused, however, prompting the president to shut down the government until funds for the wall are included in the spending bill.

King met with a far-right party that has historical ties to Nazis on a trip to Austria last October — for which he faced little more than mild criticism from lawmakers in his own party — but this week his comments sparked a flurry of reactions on social media.

“Steve King just openly embraced white supremacy,” political writer Judd Legum tweeted. “I’m waiting for A SINGLE REPUBLICAN MEMBER OF THE HOUSE to speak out against this. Seems like a pretty easy call. So far, nothing.”

Film producer Tariq Nasheed wrote, “I like the fact that Iowa Rep. Steve King is publicly professing his white supremacist agenda. This lets me & other Black Americans know to stay the hell out of the state of Iowa, because the ppl there keep electing him.”

Journalist Roland Martin was glad that conservative columnist Ben Shapiro “finally woke the f%$k up and realized that @SteveKingIA is a damn white supremacist and racist. These conservatives have given him cover for too damn long … He was a racist in October as the @weeklystandard showed with an audio recording. And he has always been one.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top