Kelly Rowland Dispels ‘Stupid’ Rumors She’s Bleaching Her Skin: ‘I Am Still Chocolate’

Kelly Rowland has been the target of claims that she is bleaching her skin and the singer is now shutting down the speculation.

The star had just touched down in Los Angeles Wednesday, Oct. 24 and decided to address the false claims about her supposedly chemically altered skin tone.

“Now, I never answer questions like this because I think it’s so stupid … but I am not the one to bleach my skin nor do I want to bleach my skin nor do I have to bleach my skin,” Rowland says on an Instagram video. “I don’t even think that that … it’s not for me. So, don’t go saying stupid stuff like that.

“Have you ever thought it could be the lighting?” she continues. “Dude, I am still chocolate. Forever chocolate, proud to be chocolate. Shout out to all my chocolate girls.”

Fans swiftly responded to Rowland’s video.

“#TeamChocalate ✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾STAY UNITED MY SISTER.”

“Amen! 🙌🏾 Not only is it unhealthy to bleach skin, beautiful healthy brown skin when taken care of glows like none other!”

“I’m cracking up at the finger twirling 😂yes let them have it kelly 👸🏾👑#melanin.”

“She always been Dark Chocolate! So something is fishy about this or maybe it’s the filters.”

“Lots of water and a healthy diet .. Her skin is flawless which makes her appear lighter.”

“I don’t understand what the big deal is with the skin color thing!! If ur light ur light if ur dark ur dark ect… C’mon black folks let’s stop with the colorism!!”

Rowland has long been an advocate for “chocolate” girls and has been outspoken about the importance of representing women of darker hues in the media.

“One of the things I looked for first was chocolate girls because I feel it’s so necessary for my niece … she has to see more chocolate women,” International Business Times reported Rowland said on a panel at SXSW in 2016 when discussing her music competition show, “Chasing Destiny.”

U

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top