NeNe Leakes Throws ‘No Weave’ Party and Fans Slam ‘RHOA’ Co-Stars for Not Supporting Kim Field’s ‘Beatless Brunch’

NeNe Leakes recently threw a weave free event that led to a huge discussion among fans in the comment section.

The “Real Housewives of Atlanta” reality star hosted a hair function for her co-stars over the weekend that prevented the ladies from wearing any wigs or hair extensions. A fan page posted a video of Leakes’ cast-mates Kandi Burruss, Cynthia Bailey and Marlo Hampton all sporting their tresses without the weaves and wigs.

The social media account wrote, “The ladies (Kandi, Marlo, Eva, Shamari, Tanya, Yovanna, Cynthia and Porsha) all joined #NeneLeakes at #CasaLeakes last night for a ‘WEAVE FREE’ get together! They were all required to show up in their natural hair. NO OR EXTENSIONS!”

However, fans weren’t too keen on Leakes “No Weave” event and compared it to former RHOA cast-mate Kim Fields’ “Beatless Brunch.”

“Didn’t Kim Fields try to do something like this,” one fan asked.

“Yep,” one person replied. “And some made a joke of it they really did her dirty. It was no makeup and they all pretty much came with it on anyway.

“But wait, a few made a big deal out of Kims ‘Beatless Brunch.’ NeNe wasn’t there at the time but it seems like a bite off of her idea. They really did Kim dirty.”

“Lol but they couldn’t show up for Kim Fields.”

“Well wait a minute! When Kim Fields did a Beatless Face/ Go Natural Theme ya’ll went off on her! Hmmm,” said one fan.

During season 8 of the RHOA, Fields hosted a social function the “Beatless Brunch” which encouraged the ladies to come make-up free. However, some of the co-stars including Kenya Moore, had an issue with the event and accused Field’s of throwing shade their way. Many of the ladies wore make-up anyway.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top