Chicago Mayor Claims New Police Reforms ‘Will Stand Test of Time’

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago’s mayor and Illinois’ attorney general unveiled an updated plan Thursday to reform the city’s police, saying it will ensure permanent, far-reaching changes within a 12,000-officer department that has a long history of committing serious civil rights abuses.

The more than 200-page document was submitted to U.S. District Judge Robert Dow for his consideration. If he approves it, an independent court monitor would ensure that the city meets the plan’s benchmarks, which are laid out over several years.

Chicago Police Oversight

Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel flanked by Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson and Attorney General Lisa Madigan, announce that they have filed a proposed consent decree in federal court to reform the Chicago Police Department, during a news conference, Thursday, Sept. 13, 2918 in Chicago. The 226-page document was submitted Thursday to a Chicago federal judge. (Antonio Perez /Chicago Tribune via AP)

The most notable change since city and state officials hammered out an initial draft in July is a new provision that would require officers to file paperwork whenever they point a gun at someone, even if they don’t fire.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel told reporters that the city is at “an historic inflection point” on police reforms. He noted there have been seven attempts in the past 100 years to overhaul how the department operates.

“I am confident this agreement will stand the test of time,” he said.

The head of Chicago’s police union issued a written statement hours later, saying such a court-supervised reform plan would be unnecessary and counterproductive. It “will have a devastating effect upon policing in Chicago,” said Kevin Graham, president of the Fraternal Order of Police, Chicago Lodge 7.

He spoke at a joint news conference with Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson — the three posing for pictures as Madigan held up what would be a court-enforced plan, called a consent decree.

The union head has strongly opposed any requirement that officers document all instances in which they point their weapons, saying it could lead officers to hesitate in situations when they are actually in danger.

Johnson said Thursday he had had similar reservations. But he said the reform plan as written now allays those concerns.

The release of the reworked plan came during jury selection in the murder trial of a white Chicago police officer, Jason Van Dyke, who shot a black teenager, Laquan McDonald, 16 times in 2014. Video of the shooting led to the firing of Johnson’s predecessor and to a damning Justice Department report in the last days of Barack Obama’s presidency that found racial bias and excessive use of force by police.

Madigan, with Emanuel’s approval, sued Chicago last year to make sure police reforms included court oversight after President Donald Trump’s Justice Department indicated it didn’t foresee a court role.

Judge Dow will invite additional community feedback before a decision on giving the plan his stamp of approval. It will include two days of hearings starting Oct. 24 for public comment.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top