Trumps Reneges on Plan to Endorse Criminal Justice Reform Ahead of 2018 Midterms

President Donald Trump is dragging his feet on a plan to endorse prison and sentencing reforms ahead of the midterm elections, a source with direct knowledge on the matter told Axios.

According to the source, Trump decided during a White House meeting Thursday afternoon that the compromise package pushed by Jared Kushner, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and other supporters was just too politically difficult to approve before the elections.

President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump initially liked the idea of a compromise bill but thought it’d be too “politically hard” to endorse ahead of the midterms. (Image courtesy of Getty Images)

“Without the president backing the bill, which might’ve reduced some mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug crimes and sent around 4,000 prisoners home, it now has zero chance of getting a vote before the mid-terms,” the Axios report read. “Senate leadership was already reluctant to bring it up for a vote.”

In August, the president met with senators and aides from both parties, expressing glee at the idea of a compromise that would include sentencing reforms pushed by Grassley in the prison reform bill approved by the House earlier this year. However, the package received harsh criticism from law-and-order hardliners Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who’ve been staunchly opposed to it.

“I don’t care about the politics; if it’s the right thing to do then we should do it,” Trump reportedly told a group of Senators when they briefed him on the plan, according to the source.

Naturally, the president’s about-face on the matter sparked praise from the Justice Department last week.

“We are pleased the president agreed that we shouldn’t support criminal justice reform that would reduce sentences, put drug traffickers back on our streets, and undermine our law enforcement officers who are working night and day to reduce violent crime and drug trafficking in the middle of an opioid crisis,” Justice Department spokesperson Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement.

The crumbling of the bill now signals a win for its biggest opponents. In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Cotton dubbed the compromise package ” a jailbreak that’d endanger communities and undercut President Trump’s campaign promise to restore law and order.” Meanwhile, Sessions has consistently opposed criminal justice reform efforts and has even been accused of quietly waging a second war on drugs to continue filling prisons.

The midterm elections will take place nationwide on Nov. 6, 2018.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top