David Clarke Says He Was ‘Duped’ by Alleged Muslim Brotherhood Operative

Former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke has denied the wool being pulled over his eyes by alleged Russian spy Maria Butina, but admits he was duped by a former business partner who he claims is an operative for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Clarke, 61, made the claims in a tweet Sunday, accusing lawyer Hedieh Mirahmadi of fooling him, local station FOX 6 Now reported.

Sheriff David Clarke

Sheriff David Clarke (left) met alleged Russian spy Maria Butina during a 2015 trip to Moscow with the NRA. (Images courtesy of Getty Images and Facebook)

“I was DUPED, not by Maria Butina but by @libertylover202 who is HEDIEH MIRAHMADI, reported to be Muslim Brotherhood operative in US government by many. People warned me. All I know is I am distancing myself now,” he wrote.

The disgraced sheriff was one of several officials that Butina’s group spent $6,000 on to cover expenses for Clarke’s trip to Russia in 2015. Last month, the Justice Department indicted Butina for trying to infiltrate the National Rifle Association and other prominent political groups.

Mirahmadi, a lawyer who has worked for the federal government, has vehemently denied Clarke’s claims, calling them inaccurate. She formerly served as Clarke’s business partner at DAC Enterprises, a company the two created after Clark resigned as Milwaukee County sheriff in 2017, according to the station.

“I wrestled with a bear and got maimed,” Mirahmadi said of her work with Clarke. “ … I consider his accusation laughable but need to confer with my attorney before I make any further comment.”

Clarke once described Mirahmadi as an “invaluable partner” and even defended her against the same accusations he made against her on Sunday.

” … When someone is unfairly smeared, they deserve a chance to defend themselves,” he wrote in 2017.

Watch more in the video below.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top