Rachel Dolezal Pleads ‘Not Guilty’ Amid Welfare Fraud Controversy

*Rachel Dolezal Pleads ‘Not Guilty” In Court Amid Welfare Fraud Wrangle

Rachel Dolezal, who stepped down from the NAACP in 2015 after she was exposed impersonating a Black woman, appeared in court on Wednesday and plead not guilty to welfare fraud.

Dolezal, who changed her name to Nkechi Diallo was charged with false verification of public assistance and accused of not reporting her income she received as the former president of the NAACP chapter. The woman reportedly enjoyed welfare benefits and refused to disclose her “In Full Color” book earnings along with other streams of income.

The case begin in March 2017 when investigators learned Diallo reported her income as less than $500 per month according to court documents obtained by WJLA. However, authorities subpoenaed the woman and discovered nearly $84,000 in deposits from 2015-2017 that was not fully reported to the state Department of Social and Health Services.

Diallo’s income resulted from soap and doll making, her memoir and other businesses according to legal files. However, she reported a “change of circumstance” to the state for a one-time gig she conducted worth $20,000 in October 2017.

The state is now asking for the $8,800 she’s been accused of stealing. The Superior Court Judge James Triplet ordered Diallo remain free with her trial date set for Sept. 10.

The 40-year-old woman who identifies as Black, was exposed of being born to white parents in rural Montana. She faced major backlash and lost her job teaching African Studies at Eastern Washington University in 2015.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top