MSNBC Panel Argues That Obama Separated Immigrant Families, Too — But There’s a Difference

During his time in office, Barack Obama was also behind some “pretty awful” policies separating immigrant families, a group of MSNBC panelists argued Friday.

Last week’s airing of “MTP Daily” focused on the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy separating children from their parents during prosecution for crossing the border unlawfully — a directive similarly enforced by the Obama administration that drew mild backlash from immigration advocates years ago.

Alfonso Aguilar, a former aide to President George W. Bush, decried the “selective outrage” from critics bashing Trump when President Obama had a similar, though less harsh, policy.

“What’s frustrating to me … is to try to give the impression that all of a sudden the Trump administration is much more inhumane compared to the Obama administration …,” Aguilar said. “Yes, this policy is worse than the policies that were in place during the Obama administration, but there were some policies during the Obama administration that were pretty awful that separated families.”

“That’s why we need immigration reform,” he added.

Host Chuck Dodd chimed in, recalling that immigration advocates protested Obama during his 2012 campaign events.

PBS reporter Yamiche Alcindor acknowledged Obama’s controversial enforcement of the policy but that argued Trump deserved more of the backlash because his campaign was essentially “built on attacking immigrants.”

“… It was a campaign that was founded — in some ways, people think — in a racist way, and then you add to that the fact that it’s a zero [tolerance] policy,” Alcindor said. This is not some families — it’s all families. I’m not saying that Obama was better. I’m just saying, as a reporter, that this is an administration that has changed a policy and made it worse.

Watch more of their discussion in the video above.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top