GOP Lawmaker Says Businesses Should be Able to Turn People Away Based on Skin Color, Then Tries to Backtrack

South Dakota Lawmaker

In his apology, Rep. Michael Clark said he never meant to advocate for race-based discrimination. (Image courtesy of the Argus Leader)

A South Dakota lawmaker has apologized for comments suggesting businesses should be allowed to refuse service to customers based on the color of their skin.

GOP Rep. Michael Clark came under fire Monday for a Facebook post shared in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding, the Argus Leader reported. Clark lauded the decision, calling it a “win for freedom of speech and freedom of religion.”

When some Facebook users took issue with his post, however, Clark argued that a business should have the final say in who is or isn’t served.

” … He should have the opportunity to run his business the way he wants,” the lawmaker wrote. “If he wants to turn away people of color, then that(‘s) his choice.”

The comment quickly drew backlash, prompting Clark to delete on Tuesday.

He later penned an apology to a reporter for the Argus Leader, which published the story on his damning remarks. Though the damage was already done, Clark tried to walk back his statements, saying he’d “jumped in on it a little bit too fast.”

“I am apologizing for some of my Facebook comments,” he wrote in the apology. “I would never advocate discriminating against people based on their color or race.”

The lawmaker’s post prompted many to question his stance on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, religion or national origin.

“You can’t turn away someone from your business because of their race, it was illegal yesterday — and it’s illegal today,” Libby Skarin, policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota said.

“Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane even commented that refusing to bake a cake for a gay couple wasn’t a far cry from discriminating against Black people.

“…It’s a shorter walk than we think, particularly today, from ‘I won’t bake them a cake because they’re gay’ to ‘I won’t seat him here because he’s black,’” MacFarlane tweeted.

https://twitter.com/SethMacFarlane/status/1003671026226483200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yahoo.com%2Fentertainment%2Fseth-macfarlane-links-not-baking-193117548.html

In an interview with the Leader, Clark attempted to clarify his comments, saying if a business owner feels strongly enough, he or she should be able to turn people away.

“People shouldn’t be able to use their minority status to bully a business,” he told the newspaper.

He added that it’s ultimately up to consumers to decide whether to patronize a business, noting that those who don’t have the support of the community will eventually go under.

“The vote of the dollar is very strong,” Clark said.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top