Sean Hannity Bought $90M In Properties Using Government Assistance, Report Reveals

Sean Hannity Welfare

Fox News host Sean Hannity has decried welfare in the past, trashing folks who receive government assistance. (Image courtesy of TIME)

Fox News host Sean Hannity claims he’s being attacked for investing his own money after a damning report revealed the conservative commentator purchased several properties using government funds.

The report, published by The Guardian on Sunday, contends Hannity amassed part of his extensive real estate portfolio with help from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development — a detail he failed to mention during an interview with HUD Secretary Ben Carson on his show last year.

Hannity dubbed the report the “latest fake news attack” against him.

“It’s ironic that I am being attacked for investing my personal money in communities that badly need such investment and in which, I’m sure, those attacking me have not invested their money,” he said in a statement. ” … The fact is, there are investments that I do not individually select, control, or know the details about — except that obviously, I believe in putting my money to work in communities that otherwise struggle to receive such support.”

Pages upon pages of public records reviewed by The Guardian linked Hannity to a group of 20 shell companies that spent close to $90 million or more on 870 homes across multiple states over the past decade, including Georgia, New York and North Carolina. Several of the properties, which ranged from luxurious mansions to low-income housing, were bought at a discount in 2013 after the previous owners defaulted on their mortgages

The news comes just a week after Hannity was named as a client of President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen, USA TODAY reported.

At the time of his purchases, the right-wing pundit publicly trashed former POTUS Barack Obama for the high foreclosure rates, despite capitalizing off the crisis. In 2016, he argued that “the dream of owning your own home has been made a nightmare under Obama for many Americans.”

Hannity has also been an outspoken critic of welfare and once called for the sterilization of an African-American man who had allegedly fathered 22 children and was receiving government assistance. He also expressed shock at a California surfer who got $189 a month in food stamps and government health insurance.

The Fox News host had no problem accepting government funds for his real estate investments, however.

One of Hannity’s most controversial purchases included two large apartment complexes in Georgia which were funded with mortgages obtained through HUD. None of those dealings were disclosed to HUD head Ben Carson during an on-air interview last year.

“I have never discussed with anybody at HUD the original loans that were obtained in the Obama years, nor the subsequent refinance of such loans, as they are a private matter,” Hannity said on Monday. “I had no role in, or responsibility for, any HUD involvement in any of these investments.”

“The LLCs are REAL companies that spend real investment money on real properties,” he added.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top