Newspaper Publisher Says It Dropped the Ball After Publishing Piece Suggesting Black Men Need a Curfew

The River Valley Times apologized for an ‘accidental’ publishing error after receiving major backlash from town residents.

The Rancho Murieta community in California called out writer Marcia Courson for insinuating that Black men needed to be in the house by a certain time in the local newspaper. Folks are now calling the columnist a racist.

Courson, produced an Op-Ed on the killing of Stephon Clark, 22, who was shot eight times by two Sacramento officers. The article implied that the tragedy may have resulted from Black males staying outside too late.

“We must not immediately assume a policeman has no reason to confront a suspect… In Stephon’s situation, the cell phone looked like a small black gun… Police have to be careful not to overreact, and you Black men might be better off at home after a certain hour,” the columnist wrote.

How did this piece get published in the first place?

The general manager David Herburger told Fox 40, he forgot to read over the article in absence of their editor.

“First of all, I want to say we do not endorse the notion of a minority-based curfew, [that] would be the best way to distill that sentence that’s in there. I felt sick I felt like I blew it I should have captured it … It reminds me of Nazi Germany. That everybody has to be indoors by a certain period of time,” Herburger said.

One resident told KVOR-TV the article was “disgusting” to read.

However, Herburger is unsure whether Courson will still be working with the newspaper.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top