Mother Exposes Text In Texas History Book Suggesting Some Blacks Were Not ‘Terribly Unhappy’ with Being Enslaved

History Textbook Slavery

Author Eileen Curtright shared a screenshot of the problematic passage from her daughter’s history textbook. (Image courtesy of @eileencurtright/Twitter)

A Texas mother was less-than-pleased with the history lesson featured in her daughter’s textbook, particularly a chapter discussing the perils of slavery.

Author Eileen Curtright took to Twitter on Monday to voice her frustration over a section of her child’s textbook that seemingly made light of the misfortune and violence suffered by enslaved Black Americans at the hands of their masters.

“My daughter’s history textbook explains that saying ‘slavery was bad’ is too simplistic & many slaves were probably fine with it,” she tweeted, accompanied by a photo showing highlighted portions of the text.

“Amazing to know some moms homeschool to protect their kids from the liberal agenda of our public schools,” she added.

https://twitter.com/eileencurtright/status/986056826604138497

According to the photo, the textbook warns readers against oversimplifying the “peculiar institution” of slavery and notes that there “kind and generous” slaveholders who didn’t maim or kill their slaves. The text goes on to say that many enslaved Blacks “… may not have even been terribly unhappy with their lot, for they knew no other.”

The tweet garnered several reactions, mostly from angry users who took issue with the textbook’s downplaying of slavery. Some accused the school system of trying to “whitewash” history and brainwash students.

The name and publisher of the textbook, which users asked to know, remains a mystery.

This isn’t the first time the Texas education system has come under fire for its problematic textbooks, however. In 2015, Texas parent Roni Dean-Burren was so incensed by passages in her child’s textbook describing enslaved Blacks as “workers” that she penned a letter to publisher McGraw Hill and demanded they correct it.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual β€” and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top