Despite Backlash, Florida Professor Offers No Apologies Over His Essay Blaming ‘Black Supremacy’ for Slavery 

Marshall DeRosa Racist

Professor Marshall DeRosa has since denied having any ties to white nationalism. (Photo by John McCall / Sun Sentinel)

A professor at Florida Atlantic University is dodging calls for his termination from students who have taken issue with his seemingly racist ideals.

In recent weeks, the university has faced mounting pressure from students to investigate political science professor Marshall DeRosa, who has faced criticism for his essays blaming slavery on so-called “Black supremacy” and his general defense of the Confederacy, Inside Higher Ed reported.

” … If faculty members here have ties to people who have in the past lynched my folks, I deserve to know that, do I not?” alumnus and graduate student Jonathan Jackson inquired during a Faculty Senate meeting last week. Video of the tense exchange has circulated on social media.

https://www.facebook.com/adam.wasserman.98/posts/986072596124

DeRosa used the meeting to address the allegations leveled against him, dubbing them as “untruths, lies and smears” against his character. He went on to say that he did not blame the students, but rather the kingpins” who “weaponized politically their fiduciary positions as faculty members at this university for political purposes, and they’re going to be rooted out.”

According to the Sun Sentinel, the professor has never made any racist or incendiary comments in class. There is a reason why the opposition against DeRosa is so fierce, however.

An article published in The Nation revealed that from 2000 to 2009, the professor served as a faculty member at the neo-Confederate League of the South Institute, a pro-secessionist group with clear ties to white nationalism. There he taught what’s called the “The Southern Constitutional Tradition” as part of the institute’s summer school program.

“I disengaged early on,” DeRosa told The Nation, distancing himself from the group. “They’d invite me to things and I would go to talk about my scholarship, especially the Confederate constitution. But I got an inkling as to some of the characters involved … [and] I didn’t feel comfortable.”

However, despite his attempt to distance himself from the group and pass it off as “a long time ago”, DeRosa’s white nationalist leanings continued appearing in several of his works as recent as last year. In a 2017 essay titled “Confederate Case Law: The Rule of Law Not Men,” the professor argued that white supremacy wasn’t the cause for slavery and that stripping white slaveholders of their property rights was unjust. Rather, he said slavery was rooted in “Black supremacy,” since some Africans also took part in the slave trade.

“The tar-baby in any defense of the Confederacy is slavery, which has segued into ‘white supremacy,’ ” DeRosa, who currently runs a private-prison education program funded by the Koch Foundation, wrote in part. “Linking the two, slavery with white supremacy is a gross over-simplification. First, Black supremacy is the origin of Southern slavery. It was blacks and Asiatic Muslims on the African continent that enslaved and sold other blacks to the slave traders.”

As bothersome as the professor’s views are, university officials said in a statement last week that it hasn’t received any formal complaints against DeRosa, according to Inside Higher Ed.

Meanwhile, Florida Atlantic said it plans to “maintain its commitments to the value of diversity and to the principles of nonviolent civil discourse and academic freedom, which encourage the free exchange of ideas fundamental to a democratic society.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top