South Carolina Solicitor Will No Longer Release the Names of Officers Involved In Shootings

Walter Slager

(NBC News)

South Carolina has decided to no longer list the names of officers involved in shootings unless they’ve been charged with a crime.

The new practice was prompted after a man allegedly sought after four deputies involved in a fatal shooting and approached them with a knife, according to Greenville News.

13th Circuit Solicitor Walt Wilkins presented a memo for the new policy.  “While a case is under review and no charges are made, we’re not going to identify a particular officer who had just had to use his service weapon… We’re not going to subject him to scrutiny by the public until a case has been vetted and completed. They still have the same rights as everybody else,” Wilkins said.

The only exception is if video footage of a police-involved shooting goes public then the officer’s identity will likely be known, the former United States Circuit Judge added.

“We’ve had officers around the country and here be threatened with physical violence with family members or others in the community,” Wilkins said.

Seth Stoughton, a former officer turned professor of University of South Carolina School of Law said he thinks the new policy is a complete mistake.

“For one, I think refusing to release an officer’s name is frankly anti-democratic… Particularly with the relatively extreme action of taking someone’s life or attempting to by shooting at them, there’s a strong public interest in knowing relevant details and that includes an officer’s name,” Stoughton told Greenville News.

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Latest from Atlanta Black Star

Back to top