Howard University Students Occupy Administration Building for Sixth Day Straight

Howard Building Takeover

The protests come amid news that university employees misappropriated financial aid funds for needy students. (Photo by Charles Garrett/@garrett24fps)

Howard University students remained unmoved Monday as they entered day six of their takeover of a campus administration building in response to revelations that HU workers misappropriated financial aid money.

Students occupying the building have refused to leave until all nine of their demands are met, according to Black America Web. Some of the requests include the ouster of university President Wayne A.I. Frederick, along with demands to end unsubstantiated tuition hikes and better efforts at fighting rape culture and campus sexual assault.

So far, only one of the demands has been met, however. On March 31, the university’s Board of Trustees agreed to protesters’ first demand to “provide adequate housing for all students under the age of 21 and extend the fall 2018 housing deposit deadline to May 1,” Alexis McKenney, an HU student and leader of activist group HU Resist, told the news site.

“We’re prepared to occupy the administration building until we’re more than satisfied that our demands have been met,” the group wrote in a press release. “…The actions we have taken are only the first steps in attaining a liberated HBCU … we are prepared to continue to negotiate with administration on the terms of our demands.”

VP of student affairs Kenneth Holmes sent an email blast to students confirming that the university would extend its deadline to put down a payment for on-campus housing. He said the school would delay renovations to the Harriet Tubman Quadrangle, better known as “The Quad,” if a large amount of students requested housing.

“Our students are our priority, and we look forward to supporting them in their holistic Howard University experience,” Holmes said in a statement.

The student protests come amid fallout from Frederick’s damning confirmation that six financial aid employees were fired last year for misappropriating university-based grants and keeping the cash for themselves. An internal investigation founds that from 2007 to 2016, several HU employees received grants on top of the discounts they were already receiving on their tuition.

The scandal wasn’t made public until last month, however, thanks to an anonymous blog post published on Medium. The post has since been deleted.

It’s still unclear how much money was embezzled from the department.

Check out photos from the #StudentPowerHU occupation below:

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top