‘What Does MARTA Stand For?’ Google Returns Racist Answer About Atlanta Transportation System 

Atlanta Marta

Atlanta Marta Station (J Tes Faye/ Atlanta Curbed)

An unnamed Reddit user Googled the roundabouts of Atlanta’s public transportation system MARTA and the answer left people puzzled.

The man who identifies himself as a 23-year-old “white guy”, was reportedly driving into town from Charlotte, North Carolina and wanted tourist advice on taking the transportation system according to the AJC. He googled “what does Marta stand for?”. But instead of the correct information Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Google Search Engine returned an offensive alternative, “Moving Africans Rapidly Through Atlanta.”

MARTA

(Becca Godwin/AJC)

Google removed the inaccurate racist language after receiving a few questions from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

The tech giant’s search engine spokeswoman Crystal Dahlen reportedly released a statement Wednesday evening, “Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We’ve looked into it and acted quickly to address the issue.”

MARTA’s spokeswoman Stephany Fisher also added to the AJC that they’re aware of the racist acronym “that was created to marginalize rapid transit and the people who depend on i.” She noted that while they’re aware of the offensive language, fixing it was not on their priority list because “attempting to control internet search results is not a productive use of our time.

We proudly serve all who need transportation and anyone who denies our passengers are diverse, doesn’t ride MARTA.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top