Woman Sues Atlanta Hawks for Giving Special Treatment to Black Employees Over Whites

Getty Images

A former Atlanta Hawks employee is claiming that a Black director created a culture at the organization that allowed for discrimination against white employees. Margo Kline sued the basketball organization on Friday after filing an employment discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports.

Kline worked in the corporate social responsibility department as a community development coordinator for five years, during that time she claims white employees, especially white women were discriminated against. She alleged that external affairs director David Lee would make “white culture” jokes, hire and promote Black employees over more qualified white employees.

White Women Sues Atlanta Hawks for Racial Discrimination Against White Employees

Kline allegedly reported her complaints but was ignored and ridiculed by the organization. The lawsuit further alleged that white employees were encouraged to stay away from Kline if they hoped to keep their job. Kline was eventually fired in March 2017 due to her conduct and performance issues. A charge she denies and instead claims that she tried in vain to seek ways to improve her performance.

In a statement to the AJC, the Hawks stated, “We take all claims of discrimination seriously and have performed a thorough review of these baseless claims. The case was quickly dismissed at the EEOC level. We deny these claims and will vigorously defend against them.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top