Tavis Smiley Allegedly Sent Co-Worker Porn, According to PBS Countersuit

Tavis Smiley

Tavis Smiley was accused of sexual misconduct in December. (Photo by Earl Gibson III/Getty Images)

PBS has hit back at former network host Tavis Smiley over allegations of workplace sexual misconduct.

In documents filed at a Washington, D.C. court Friday, March 23, TMZ reported PBS alleges Smiley has engaged in sexual misconduct for years. The suit, which follows Smiley’s filing against the public broadcaster in February, says PBS discovered the 53-year-old had several sexual encounters with underlings, made unwanted sexual advances on them and commented on subordinates’ bodies.

He allegedly told a woman that he “would like to see her on her back more often” and is said to have admitted he “may” have sent pornographic images to colleagues.

In response to PBS’ suit, Smiley’s spokesperson told TheWrap it’s filled with nothing but “More lies, half-truths and smears from PBS from an ‘investigation ‘ that never should have happened, with a result that was decided well before the inquiry was even begun.

“We look forward to the full truth coming out in court,” the spokesperson added.

Smiley had filed a suit against his former home network in February in which he alleged his firing from PBS, which occurred after the allegations surfaced in December, was racially motivated.

“I’ve spent the bulk of my career in public media, so filing a lawsuit against PBS was the last thing I wanted to do,” he told The Washington Post last month. “But litigation seems to be the only way to get at the truth.”

At the time, PBS dismissed his remarks as “meritless.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top