GOP Lawmaker Hopes for House Vote on Protecting Immigrants

immigration status

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients and other young immigrants march with supporters as they arrive at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, March 5, 2018. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

The election-year effort by Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., could be an uphill climb.

Most Republicans don’t want to extend the program unless lawmakers also provide billions of dollars to start building President Donald Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico. And some Democrats may not back what they see as a temporary fix to a problem they want permanently resolved — and that many say should also provide the immigrants with a pathway to citizenship.

Under House rules, Coffman will need 218 signatures on a “discharge petition” to force a vote on his bill. Coffman’s bill has 31 co-sponsors about evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats.

“We must give these youths the certainty that they can continue to work and study here in the U.S. while Congress debates broader legislation to fix our flawed immigration system,” Coffman wrote in a letter that urged members of both parties to support his measure.

Coffman faces a competitive re-election race this year in a district surrounding Denver in which around one in five voters are Hispanic.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., has said his preference is to round up votes for a wider-ranging conservative bill that imposes restrictions on legal immigration.

Coffman announced his plan on the date that Trump set as a deadline for Congress to approve legislation renewing those protections. Trump ended the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, last year but gave Congress until March 5 to resurrect it.

The program lets young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children, called Dreamers, temporarily stay in the country and get jobs.

A stalemated Senate has rejected several proposals aimed at helping the Dreamers. The Supreme Court has ordered the administration to continue renewing DACA permits while cases progress through the federal courts — a process likely to take months, draining Congress’ sense of urgency.

Earlier Monday, Trump continued blaming Democrats for the impasse.

“It’s March 5th and the Democrats are nowhere to be found on DACA. … We are ready to make a deal!” he tweeted.

It was unclear whether members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus would back Coffman. One member, Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., said he wondered if the Colorado lawmaker was pushing his measure hard with fellow Republicans or if it was “just a way to cover himself for his re-election.”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top