Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Politics/National
NationalNewsRace

Jimmy Kimmel Sparks Unexpected Debate Over Use of the Word ‘Minority’

Posted byBy Tanasia Kenney | Published on: CommentsComments (1)

A new Twitter debate is underway, this time overuse of the term “minorities,” versus “POC,” or people of color.

The discussion seemingly stemmed from host Jimmy Kimmel’s use of the word at Sunday night’s Academy Awards in Hollywood, Calif., which some viewers found to be problematic.

“‘Black Panther’ and ‘Wonder Woman’ were massive hits, which is almost miraculous because I remember a time when the major studios didn’t believe a woman or a minority could open a superhero movie,” Kimmel joked. “And the reason I remember that time is because it was March of last year.”

Twitter user N’Jadaka argued against the blanket term, however, noting that persons of color aren’t an outnumbered group.

https://twitter.com/TheNewThinkerr/status/970466608153022465


The comments drew swift reaction from fellow users, some of whom balked at any form of the term “colored/color” to describe people of African descent.

https://twitter.com/RASmiFraz/status/970502036209909761

Other users sided with N’Jadaka, sharing stats proving that people of the Black or African Diaspora account for 20 percent of the world’s population. This number doesn’t include bi-racial persons, however, meaning the percentage is likely higher. Meanwhile, it’s estimated that whites comprise just 16 percent of the global population, according to a 2010 thread on Science Chat Forum.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top