Samuel L. Jackson Slams Trump’s Claim He’d Enter School Without Weapon

Since the Florida School Massacre, Donald Trump has come under fire for his stance on “arming teachers” as a way to deal with school shootings. Actor Samuel L.  Jackson took to Twitter to slam the president’s theory. “Can someone that’s been in a Gunfight tell that Mutha****a that’s Never been in a Gunfight, the flaws of his Arm The Teachers plan??!!”

Then on Monday, Feb 26. Trump criticized the armed sheriff deputy who hid while the gunman killed 17 people insideMarjory Stoneman Douglas High School.  The president stated he would have entered the school without a weapon. “You don’t know until you test it, but I think, I really believe I’d run in there, even if I didn’t have a weapon, and I think most of the people in this room would have done that too.”

“The Hateful Eight” actor took to Twitter once again to poke fun at Trump’s comments.  “First of all, “I really believe I’d run in there”,Stop!!! Run??!! Really, hahahahaha, not even if his own kids we’re in there!GTFOH”

Everyone thought Jackson’s response was hilarious and joined in on the joke.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top