Maxine Waters Fires Back at Trump on Oprah’s Behalf

maxine waters trump

Maxine Waters is known for calling out Donald Trump.(Earl Gibson III/WireImage/Gage Skidmore)

While Oprah Winfrey has yet to respond to President Donald Trump’s tweet about her “60 Minutes” special, Rep. Maxine Waters made time to take up for the mogul.

On Twitter Tuesday, Feb. 20, the woman who is lovingly known as Auntie Maxine, said, “What? Oprah insecure? I don’t think so. As a matter of fact, Oprah is richer than you are. Deal with that. Not true? Show your tax returns!”

However, while Forbes reported Winfrey does have a $2.8 billion net worth, President Trump’s is $3.1 billion. So while Waters may not have gotten that part right, the former reality TV show host still has yet to release his 2017 tax returns to prove it.

Trump tweeted Sunday night after watching Winfrey’s followup with partisan Michigan voters that she was “very insecure” and that her questions were “biased and slanted, the facts incorrect.” He also hoped that she would run for the presidency in 2020 so that “she can be exposed and defeated just like all of the others!”

Regardless, Waters had a good bit of support for her tweet.

https://twitter.com/amourwest/status/965981997964320769

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top