Black Rebels: Meet the Fearless Black Female Warriors of the Dahomey Kingdom

Dohomey Amazons

Dahomey Amazons or Female Warriors 1897 (Present-day Benin) (Photo by Chris Hellier/Corbis via Getty Images)

The Dahomey Amazons (17th Century – 19th Century)

  1. The Dahomey Amazons, or Mino, were an all-female regime of the Fon people of the Kingdom of Dahomey in what is the present-day Republic of Benin.
  2. The expertly trained female fighters were notorious for decapitating their opponents in battle. Those unfortunate enough to have been taken captive often suffered the same fate.
  3. The women fought side-by-side with male soldiers to defeat the French in 1890 during the First Franco-Dahomean War.
  4. The French army lost several battles against the Fon, thanks to the strength and skill of the female warriors.
  5. They referred to themselves as Ahosi, meaning “king’s wives,” or Mino, meaning “our mothers” in the Fon language, but were dubbed “Dohomey Amazons” for their similarity to the semi-mythical Amazons of the Anatolia.
  6. Once becoming Amazon warriors, the women weren’t allowed to marry or have children.
  7. The Fon’s female army was comprised of several subgroups, including the artillery women, the elephant huntresses, the musket-bearing frontline group, the razor women and the archers.
  8. The women had extensive training and carried muskets, cannon and even modern artillery in their later days.
  9. In addition to serving in the military, the female warriors had daily chores in the royal household, such as indigo dyeing, weaving and embroidering.
  10. The Dahomey Kingdom was ultimately conquered by the French 1892, leading to the disbanding of the Dahomey Amazon army.

The Dahomey Amazon warriors are part of our Black Rebel series for Black History Month.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top