South Carolina Man Gets Shot After Making Racial Remark About Martin Luther King, Deputies Say

white man shot MLK

Jimmy Duvall admitted that he and a friend had been drinking and smoking pot before he made the racist remark. Image courtesy of Curbed.com

A South Carolina man was shot in the head earlier this week after he used a racial slur to describe the federal holiday honoring civil rights icon Martin Luther King, Jr.

According to the Anderson Independent Mail, 60-year-old Jimmy Duvall Jr., told authorities he was shot by a Black man after the former made a disparaging remark about the holiday. Duvall admitted he and a friend had been drinking and smoking pot at his home before the shooting. The incident took place near the home around 5:30 p.m.

He told officers that after saying the slur aloud, a Black man pulled a firearm out of his waistband and shot him in the head. The bullet left a crescent-shaped scar above his eye, according to an incident report.

A spokeswoman for the Anderson County Sheriff’s Office said the shooting is being investigated and that so far, no arrests have been made.

Duvall suffered non-life threatening injuries.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top