Chris Hayes Flabbergasted By Republican’s Gall In Describing Haiti as ‘Deplorable,’ ‘Disgusting’

 

Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz had plenty of critical things to say about the island nation of Haiti, but stopped short of condemning President Donald Trump for his recent comments about immigrants from so-called “shithole” countries.

During an appearance on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes”, the congressman defended Trumps’s racist remarks, echoing the president’s viewpoint that “the conditions in some countries are really bad.”

Hayes made an effort to tug at Gaetz’ heartstrings by asking if he would be understandably upset if someone described his district of Okaloosa County as a “shithole” – but to no avail.

“Yes, [but] I could also prove you wrong,” Gaetz told the MSNBC host. “I could bring you to Okaloosa County and show you that its the home of the most beautiful beaches in America. I don’t know if Haiti can make the same claim.”

Gaetz went on to describe the conditions in Haiti as “deplorable,” saying all he saw was “sheet metal and garbage” when he was there.

Hayes rolled his eyes in visible disbelief at the lawmaker’s response, and things only worsened from there.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top