Sarah Sanders Does the Two-Step Around Reporter Grilling Her Over Trump’s Preference for White Immigrants

ABC reporter Cecilia Vega demanded answers for Trump’s “shithole countries” comment he reportedly made last week referring to Haiti and Africa. He also questioned lawmakers about why the United States couldn’t have more people coming from places like Norway. Many Americans were outraged by his comment.

During a recent White House debriefing, Vega asked White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, “Does a good deal include preferring white immigrants from Norway than black and brown immigrants from Haiti?”

The conversation quickly became tense as Sander’s responded back. “Not at all… In fact, it’s actually the opposite because by definition a merit-based system is colorblind. It’s not based on race. It’s actually based on the merits of whether or not this person is going to be contributing to society.”

However, that didn’t deter Vega from pressing Sanders a little harder, “But he did mention country of origin. The fact is, the countries that he mentioned, one is very white and the others are very not white. That’s about race is it not?”

Sanders quickly diverted the conversation back to Trump working on an immigration plan that levels “the playing field” and it’s opposite to what Vega was suggesting.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top