NYPD Union Sues to Stop Release of All Body Cam Footage, Claims It Violates Officers’ Civil Rights

Police Body Cam

A New York City official argued against the police union’s claims, saying that body cam footage is not subject to the laws laid out in the city’s Civil Rights Law. (Photo by BORIS HORVAT/AFP/Getty Images)

New York City’s largest police union has filed suit against Mayor Bill De Blasio in an effort to stop the release of any and all body camera footage obtained by the NYPD.

The 30-page petition, filed by the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association on Jan. 9, argues that the release of such police video violates the civil rights of NYPD officers, Newsweek reported. It also alleges that New York State Civil Rights statutes prohibit the release of records used to assess performance “towards continued employment [or] promotion” – unless otherwise granted access by a court order.

“These selective releases are clearly prohibited by statute [and] a long-standing court precedent, and reflect a reckless disregard for very serious safety, privacy, due process, and other interests,” attorney Michael Bowe wrote in a memorandum filed alongside the lawsuit.

Moreover, the PBA charged that stopping the release of footage captured by police body cameras would prevent respondents from “…selectively releasing footage to serve their own political or other objectives.” Their lawsuit also warned against making such footage public, arguing that it has the potential to create prejudice “toward those accused of wrongdoing or to the investigation or prosecution of such potential wrongdoing.”

In a statement, PBA President Patrick Lynch slammed De Blasio and the NYPD, accusing both of showing “reckless disregard” for officers’ concerns and claiming that both are guilty of “selectively releasing portions of videos to suit their own interests.”

“The basis of this suit is simple: we’re suing to prevent the Mayor and the NYPD from arbitrarily and illegally releasing body camera footage,” Lynch said in a statement.

“Nobody with a stake in these issues should be comfortable with this politicized, secret and unchecked process,” he continued. “Not the district attorneys, not good government advocates, not the public, and certainly not police officers and their families whose personal safety is being placed at risk.”

Speaking to Newsweek, a city official said police body camera footage is NOT subject to the civil rights rules laid out in the PBA lawsuit. Rather Civil Rights Law Section 50-a was enacted with the goal of preventing the release of disciplinary records that could be exploited and to block the release of highly sensitive personnel files.

In the event of a “critical incident” involving body cam footage, however, authorities may take the video and create a new version with necessary redactions, the official explained.

The police union doesn’t acknowledge this argument in its complaint, according to the newspaper.

New York City launched its police body cam program in April 2015 with the goal of having all its patrol officers equipped with the tiny devices by the end of 2019.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top