Conservative Guest Gets Ripped To Shreds for Suggesting Trump Is Improving Lives of Black Americans

Commentator Keith Boykin popped his top during a CNN broadcast this week after fellow commentator Carrie Sheffield suggested that President Donald Trump’s laws and policies have bettered the lives of African-Americans.

“I would love to see more unifying language coming from the Republican leadership, I’d love to see it coming from the president,” Sheffield remarked, alluding to Trump’s recent “shithole” comments about immigrants from Haiti, Africa and El Salvador.

“But I do think it is also important to look again at the policies and see how the lives of African-Americans have been improved,” she added.

Boykins, clearly agitated, tried to get a word in but could not. When it was finally his turn to speak, the broadcaster launched into a full-blown tirade against the Trump-supporting analyst.

“This nonsense that is going on out here from Carrie. Carrie, this is ridiculous,” Boykin began, pointing out that the Black unemployment rate was slashed in half under former President Barack Obama. Meanwhile, Trump’s called the numbers “fake” during his 2016 presidential campaign.

“He lied about the African-American unemployment rate!” Boykin shouted. “And then as soon as he got in office, he inherited the declining unemployment numbers and he took credit for what President Obama did. That is disgusting, it’s abhorrent and the president should apologize to President Obama not only for the lies about the birth certificate but about the lies about the African-American community that he continues to spread!”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top