Russell Simmons Takes Polygraph Test to Prove Innocence; NYPD Launches Investigation

Russell Simmons rape

Russell Simmons captured taking a polygraph test to prove his innocence. (Credit: TMZ)

Russell Simmons agreed to a lie detector test to prove he did not sexually assault model Keri Claussen Khalighi. The model accused Simmons of forcing her to perform oral sex while film director Brett Ratner watched. Khalighi was 17 at the time of the incident which allegedly took place in 1991. According to TMZ, who also obtained the photo, Simmons team said the test was administered by a “national leader in the field of polygraphing.”

Simmons attorney Michael Sterling and E. Carlos Tanner, who initially advised against the polygraph, said the former Dej Jam exec passed the test. There are plans for Simmons to take the test for each of the other 4 women who claimed he assaulted them.

Earlier today, Simmons created a #notme campaign but insists that it isn’t to “diminish the #metoo movement in any way but to hold his accusers accountable.

The music mogul has a long road ahead to clear his name. Los Angeles Times reports that the NYPD’s special victims unit has launched an investigation into the cases that took place in the city.

“We were made aware of the alleged crime through the media, and we anticipate there will be more who come forward,” a source told the publication. Adding, “We’re in the process of setting up interviews and if any victims want to come forward, they should contact us.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bcr6U8AgyNL/?taken-by=unclerush

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top