Texas Officer Fired in Shooting of Black Man Mistaken for Burglar

The Texas officer under investigation for shooting and injuring a Black man he mistook for a burglary suspect has been terminated, department officials announced this week.

In a statement late Wednesday, Nov. 29, Mesquite Police Chief Charles Cato announced the firing of officer Derick Wiley after an internal investigation into the Nov. 8 shooting of Lyndo Jones, who was trying to unlock his own truck, NBC Dallas-Forth reported.

Cato said the probe revealed that Wiley had violated department policy when he shot the 31-year-old man. He stopped short of saying exactly which policy was broken, however.

That day, police responded to reports of a man breaking into a car, setting off its alarm. Officers said they were unaware the truck actually belonged to Jones, who was trying to get into his locked vehicle.

The Dallas man was shot twice after a scuffle with Wiley and other officers, according to AP. Jones was charged with evading arrest, which he denied doing. Officers later acknowledged that the truck belonged to him, and the charges were dropped.

The case has since been heard by a Dallas County grand jury, according to NBC DFW.

“On behalf of Lyndo Jones and his family we regard the indefinite suspension of Mesquite Police Department Officer Derick Wiley with guarded optimism,” Jones’ attorney, Lee Merritt, said in a statement Thursday, Nov. 30. ” … We remain hopeful that the Grand Jury will recommend the appropriate indictment in this matter.”

Cato said the Mesquite PD would not make any additional comments until the grand jury completes its review of the case. Wiley was a 10-year veteran of the department before his termination.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top