‘Concerned Black Students’ Call on Duke to Address Alleged Hazing in African-American Sororities, Fraternities

Concerned Black Students

Duke University is accused of failing to address and investigate alleged incidents of hazing withing NPHC organizations at the school. (Image courtesy of Duke.edu.)

An anonymous group is threatening to release information about hazing at Duke University if the administration continues ignoring its claims.

A letter signed by a group dubbing itself “Concerned Black Students” accuses Duke Student Affairs of turning a blind eye to annual hazing practiced within historically Black fraternities and sororities at the school, according to The Herald-Sun. The students sent the strongly–worded letter to student affairs VP Larry Moneta and other university leaders Wednesday, Nov. 15, criticizing them for their “willful ignorance and complicity in the annual abuse of Black students.”

“National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) organizations at Duke have had a long history of using mental, physical and emotional abuse as part of their pledging processes,” the letter read. “Not only is this abuse illegal, but it infringes on prohibitions on hazing set to protect all students at this university and contradicts everything we hold dear as an institution.”

The group alleged that the University has tried to sweep instances of hazing within these organizations under the rug for too long, and demanded that it instead begin sanctioning organizations that participate in the violent initiations of African-American pledges. There are currently eight NPHC fraternities and sororities on the campus.

“If action is not taken, we are prepared to bring forth specific information on the practices of these organizations and the methods in which the University attempts to cover it up,” the letter continued. “We urge the Duke Administration to further investigate this matter seriously and intentionally.”

Moneta quickly responded to the student’s claims, calling them untrue. He maintained that Duke has always taken incidents of hazing seriously and held organizations accountable.

“Nothing has changed and nothing will change,” Moneta told campus newspaper The Chronicle, which first reported the accusations. “I regret that whomever you are, you felt need to use this communications method and have taken the position that Duke would rather hide evidence of hazing than take quick and decisive action.”

Michael Ivory Jr., president of Duke’s Black Student Alliance, took to the organization’s Facebook page this week to make clear that he took the students’ concerns very seriously. In a statement, he wrote that the BSA “adamantly and wholeheartedly” condemns hazing.

“Hazing is a dangerous practice which calls into question the mental, physical, and emotional welfare of Black students,” Ivory added. “…  It has no place in a community that envisions its members experiencing and leaving this campus as healthy and whole people. If we will address the notions of trauma as it relates to Black identity honestly and productively, then this must be part of what we examine and handle.”

In a separate email to The Chronicle, Concerned Black Students alleged that covert hazing had occurred in several NPHC fraternities and sororities at Duke, including Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity Inc., which recently unveiled its newest members. The group also noted that Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. was allegedly under investigation. The organization later refuted those claims.

The accusations come amid a string of hazing deaths involving white pledges at other big-name universities across the country. So far, officials at Texas State University, Florida State University and Louisiana State University have suspended Greek life activities after the deaths of new fraternity members.

Concerned Black Students is hoping to end the annual hazing practices to ensure Duke University pledges don’t meet this same fate.

“Our peers our suffering,” the group wrote. “Our community is suffering. Our university is suffering, and we’re all complicit.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top