New York Cop Found Not Guilty In Road Rage Shooting of Unarmed Black Man

New York Officer Acquitted

Officer Wayne Isaacs (left) claimed Delrawn Small (right) attacked him during a traffic dispute last July. (Images courtesy of Gabriella Bass/Facebook)

A New York City officer was acquitted Monday, Nov. 6, in the off-duty shooting that left an unarmed man dead after a late-night road rage incident last summer.

A jury of seven women and five men found Officer Wayne Isaacs not guilty in the shooting death of Delrawn Small, 37, who the officer claimed attacked him during a traffic dispute in Brooklyn on July 4, 2016, The New York Times reported. Isaacs faced both second–degree murder and manslaughter charges in the killing, which could’ve landed him anywhere from 25 years to life behind bars if convicted.

The verdict drew cheers of joy and relief from the officer’s family. Meanwhile, those who had gathered to see justice for Small, including relatives and community activists, were roiled with anger and disbelief.

“Every piece of evidence pointed to a guilty verdict — every single piece,” Small’s brother, Victor Dempsey, said, enraged, according to the New York Post. “He is a murderer, that’s it … How the hell are we supposed to feel now?”

With tears in her eyes, the slain man’s sister, Victoria Davis, expressed disbelief as to how and why the court didn’t find her brother’s killer guilty.

“He took everything from us!” she sobbed.

Isaacs testified in his own defense last week, telling jurors he opened fire on Small after the father of two approached his car at a stoplight and threatened to “f—-g kill” him. He also claimed Small punched him in the face multiple times.

“At this point, I’m thinking, you know, I’m here in East New York, at that time of the night,” Isaacs testified, according to court transcripts.”I’m here and I’m thinking maybe somebody, you know, somebody recognizes me from a previous arrest, or I was going to be carjacked. Something bad seemed like it [was] going to happen because he — you could tell he was in a rage coming at me.”

Surveillance footage released almost a week after the shooting showed no altercation had occurred, however. The grainy footage revealed that the officer started shooting moments before Small even reached the driver side window. He was shot three times at close range before stumbling onto the pavement.

Small’s girlfriend and 14-year-old stepdaughter, who witnessed the deadly shooting from their car, testified that Isaacs had cut them off in traffic minutes before the incident.

Isaacs is the first officer to be tried under a 2015 executive ruling by Gov. Andrew Cuomo to probe and prosecute police killings of unarmed civilians, the Times reported. The order was spurred by public outcry over the high profile police killings of Black Americans.

Isaacs remains on paid suspension and could still face departmental charges, according to the newspaper. Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge Alexander Jeong left the officer with these words:

“Only you know what exactly happened out there. So no one’s passing any judgment. And let’s try to hope that we have no further incidents like this in the future. I guess that is the only thing I can hope for.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top