Stella McCartney’s Ankara Prints on Spring Runway Set Off Debate Over African Origins

Another fashion week calls for another bout of cultural appropriation accusations. This time, Director/photographer Amarachi Nwosu called out Stella McCartney’s Paris Fashion Week design for stealing African Ankara print. To add insult to injury, Nwosu pointed out the spring 2018 collection featured only one Black model on the runway.

Ankara is an all-cotton fabric found in various designs. It is known by various names, including African wax prints, Dutch prints and Holland prints, according to All Things Ankara. The website says the designs are created using batik, an Indonesian technique that creates patterns by prohibiting the wax from covering the whole fabric. All this has led to some debate about whether or not McCartney’s use of Ankara is actually cultural appropriation.


Authentically African Fashion Designs You Can Get Behind

Dressmaker Elevates Beautiful, Bold African Prints with Thriving Online Business

Young Entrepreneurs Combine Web Savvy, African Tradition, Strike Gold in Kente-Colored Swimwear Line

Ohio Teen Ditches White Teacher’s Advice Who Said African Print Is ‘Too Tacky for Prom’ and Joins #AfricanProm Trend


https://twitter.com/heaven_vinyl/status/915636571608686592

Still, many were fired up over McCartney’s ready-to-wear collection.

Others straight up clowned the designs.

This isn’t the first time McCartney has spurred similar criticism. Nigerians were angered over the fashion designer’s photo collaboration with a Nigerian-Jamaican photographer in May. To many, it simply reinforced stereotypical ideas of the country.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top