Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Entertainment
EntertainmentSports

Sports Illustrated Fails Miserably In Attempt to Explain Why Kaepernick Was Left Off Cover

Posted byBy Kiersten Willis | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

Sports Illustrated has finally responded to the wave of criticism over the magazine’s “Sports United” cover. The Oct. 2 issue includes LeBron James, Seattle Seahawks defensive end Michael Bennett, Stephen Curry and NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. But one person was notably absent: Colin Kaepernick. He spurred the protest during the national anthem last season to draw a spotlight on Black oppression. Thus, many have been outraged that the cover shunned the free agent quarterback. But SI executive editor Steve Canella says Kaepernick’s presence is simply felt and not seen.

“In some ways, even though his picture is not there, Colin Kaepernick is there,” Cannella says on “Sports Illustrated Now” Tuesday, Sept. 26. “I think we all know that. Colin Kaepernick was —  for lack of a better word — was looming over everything that happened this past weekend. And looms over many issues in society right now.

“I thought what we were trying to capture with this cover was the way new voices emerged this weekend and the way this debate, this issue, this protest movement has sort of evolved even beyond Colin Kaepernick. He’s the guy who started it all. I think we saw a lot more people in various ways sort of join the movement … this weekend. That’s what we’re trying to capture on that cover. Colin Kaepernick is on that cover even if his face and his name aren’t there, we all know who stands behind this movement. We all know who got it started. Colin Kaepernick has many more brothers than he did a week ago.”

https://twitter.com/SInow/status/912617770734338048

Canella also briefly addressed criticism over including Goodell on the cover since some believed he had a tepid response to Donald Trump’s diss of athlete protests.

More News About NFL Protests

Brandon Marshall: If NFL Teams Really Want to Support Kaepernick, They Can Hire Him

Shepard Smith Sets the Record Straight When Reporter Makes False Claim About NFL Protest

NFL Protests: More Than 200 Players Choose to Not Stand for National Anthem (Photos)

“Divisive comments like these demonstrate an unfortunate lack of respect for the NFL, our great game and all of our players, and a failure to understand the overwhelming force for good our clubs and players represent in our communities,” Goodell said in part.

“For better or worse, Roger Goodell is the NFL,” Canella says. “He represents the shield. … I thought he came out fairly strong or stronger than I expected anyway. … [The cover] is just a statement about the way people have come together. I think it’s pretty clear which side of the issue Roger Goodell stood on.”

Yet there are several people who are unsatisfied with Canella’s explanation.

Among the many who aren’t applauding the “Sports United” cover is Steph Curry. While speaking to reporters Wednesday, Sept. 27, the Golden State Warriors point guard was unfazed about being included on the cover.

“That was terrible,” Curry says of Kaepernick’s noninclusion. “If you don’t have [Kaepernick] front and center, something’s wrong.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top