Kendall Jenner Still Catching Heat for Rap Legends T-Shirt

Remember the uproar over Kendall and Kylie Jenner’s brand releasing T-shirts with their image superimposed over icons like Tupac and Biggie? Well, the fallout isn’t over.

Al Pereira, known for his iconic images of famed hip hop acts like Queen Latifah and Ol’ Dirty Bastard, claims Kendall Jenner, Inc., had no right to use his image of Tupac, Biggie and Redman. TMZ reported the suit Tuesday, Sept. 12, which comes months after Voletta Wallace, the mother of the late Notorious B.I.G., and photographer Michael Miller took legal action.


Kendall Jenner’s Rap (T-Shirt) Battle

Photographer Sues Kendall and Kylie Jenner Over Tupac Shakur T-shirts

Biggie’s Mom Is Not Ready to Accept Kylie and Kendall’s Apology for Their ‘Disrespectful’ T-Shirts: This Matter Is Not Resolved

Kylie and Kendall Jenner Endure Well-Deserved Backlash for Their Latest Collection of Vintage-Inspired Tees


Jenner’s label with her sister, Kylie, Kendall + Kylie, sold tees adorned with images of rap and rock icons and themselves earlier this year at $125 a pop. When controversy erupted, her company took the apparel offline and the sisters issued an apology. Doing so hasn’t stopped the lawsuits from coming, however. Wallace wrote on Instagram that the Jenner’s design choice was “disrespectful, disgusting and exploitation.”

While the Jenners have yet to publicly respond to Wallace’s June statement, their label shot back at Miller’s copyright infringement suit. Only two Pac tees were sold, it said according to Page Six. It also mentioned that the shirts were from a company with a valid license to sell them.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top