Kendall Jenner Still Catching Heat for Rap Legends T-Shirt

Remember the uproar over Kendall and Kylie Jenner’s brand releasing T-shirts with their image superimposed over icons like Tupac and Biggie? Well, the fallout isn’t over.

Al Pereira, known for his iconic images of famed hip hop acts like Queen Latifah and Ol’ Dirty Bastard, claims Kendall Jenner, Inc., had no right to use his image of Tupac, Biggie and Redman. TMZ reported the suit Tuesday, Sept. 12, which comes months after Voletta Wallace, the mother of the late Notorious B.I.G., and photographer Michael Miller took legal action.


Kendall Jenner’s Rap (T-Shirt) Battle

Photographer Sues Kendall and Kylie Jenner Over Tupac Shakur T-shirts

Biggie’s Mom Is Not Ready to Accept Kylie and Kendall’s Apology for Their ‘Disrespectful’ T-Shirts: This Matter Is Not Resolved

Kylie and Kendall Jenner Endure Well-Deserved Backlash for Their Latest Collection of Vintage-Inspired Tees


Jenner’s label with her sister, Kylie, Kendall + Kylie, sold tees adorned with images of rap and rock icons and themselves earlier this year at $125 a pop. When controversy erupted, her company took the apparel offline and the sisters issued an apology. Doing so hasn’t stopped the lawsuits from coming, however. Wallace wrote on Instagram that the Jenner’s design choice was “disrespectful, disgusting and exploitation.”

While the Jenners have yet to publicly respond to Wallace’s June statement, their label shot back at Miller’s copyright infringement suit. Only two Pac tees were sold, it said according to Page Six. It also mentioned that the shirts were from a company with a valid license to sell them.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top