Kicking, Punching Allowed: That’s the Word from Ohio PD After Brutal Assault

 

Cell phone video posted to social media this week appears to show Columbus police kicking and punching a suspect during an arrest at a neighborhood market.

The video, taken by bystanders inside the store, shows officers trying to restrain 31-year-old Timothy Davis, who police claimed “tensed up to fight” and took an officer down with him after learning he was under arrest, NBC4i reported. Officers later charged Davis with resisting arrest.

Eyewitnesses at the store felt police used excessive force, however.

“They’re beating the f–k out of him,” one man is heard saying during the Sept. 2 arrest. “They’re beating his ass. That’s a lawsuit.”

A woman also is heard on the video asking, “Why are they beating him like that?”

Davis, who had a warrant out for his arrest, reportedly has a history of charges related to resisting arrest and assault, according to NBC4i. In the video, police are heard repeatedly instructing the Ohio man to put his hands behind his back and stop resisting before being forced to the ground. That’s when officers are seen repeatedly punching and kicking Davis once he’s already down.

Speaking with the news station, police spokesman Sgt. Dean Worthington defended the actions of the officers, saying the use of force depends on the behavior of the suspect at the time.

“We are allowed to punch, we are allowed to kick,” Worthington said. “It’s part of our use-of-force continuum.”

Outcry over the alleged excessive force led some on social media to call for a boycott of the store where the arrest occurred, placing blame on the store’s owner, the news station said. Backlash over the incident also led to anti-police brutality rallies in Columbus.

Worthington said there’s an Internal Affairs investigation underway to determine whether the force officers used on Davis was reasonable or not.

“We’re looking into it,” he said.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top