Descendants of Enslaved Blacks Owned by Cherokee Nation Finally Granted Tribal Citizenship

Marilyn Vann, (far left), a Cherokee Freedmen, called the judge’s ruling nothing short of “groundbreaking.” (Image courtesy of Blog Spot).

After a 40-year battle, the descendants of enslaved Blacks who were once owned by the Cherokee Nation — also known as Cherokee Freedmen — have finally been granted tribal citizenship, thanks to a federal court ruling out of Washington, D.C. this week.

U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan ruled Wednesday, Aug. 30, that Cherokee Freedmen have citizenship rights, settling the longstanding dispute between the Freedmen and the second-largest tribe in the U.S.

“The Cherokee Nation can continue to define itself as it sees fit,” Hogan wrote in his ruling. “But [it] must do so equally and evenhandedly with respect to native Cherokees, and the descendants of Cherokee Freedmen … their fates under the Cherokee Nation Constitution rise and fall equally, and in tandem.”

Following emancipation, an 1866 treaty signed between the Tahlequah, Oklahoma-based Cherokees and the U.S. government granted the tribe’s freedmen “all the rights of Native Cherokees,” according to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian. But in 2007, the tribe amended its constitution to make “Indian blood” a requirement for citizenship.

As a result, nearly 2,800 Freedmen were stripped of their membership.

NPR reported that the U.S. government opposed the tribe’s vote to expel the Freedmen and their descendants. At one point, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development even cut $37 million in funding to the Cherokee Nation as a result.

For Marilyn Vann, president of the Descendants of Freedmen of the Five Civilized Tribes, Wednesday’s decision is nothing short of “groundbreaking.”

“There can be racial justice, but it doesn’t always come easy,” Vann, who also is one of the plaintiffs in the case, told NPR. “What this means for me is the Freedmen people will be able to continue our citizenship … and also that we’re able to preserve our history. All we ever wanted was the rights promised us to continue to be enforced.”

In a separate statement, Vann said, “Going forward, I am hoping that the tribe will come together and we can just be Cherokees, Cherokee people and not freedmen … and maybe we can become the most powerful tribe in the entire country.”

Under the judge’s ruling, Cherokee Freedmen would be afforded all the rights that Native Cherokees have, including the right to vote in elections, run for office and receive health care and housing benefits, the Associated Press reported.

Todd Hembree, the tribe’s attorney general, said in a statement Thursday that the Cherokee Nation doesn’t plan to appeal the decision.

“While the U.S. District Court ruled against the Cherokee Nation, I do not see it as a defeat,” Hembree wrote. “As the Attorney General, I see this as an opportunity to resolve the Freedmen citizenship issue and allow the Cherokee Nation to move beyond this dispute.

“My office will work tirelessly to thoroughly review this decision and its legal ramifications, and will move forward in a way that best serves the interests of the Cherokee Nation and its citizens, including Freedmen descendants.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top