Fans Come to Keke Palmer’s Defense After Entertainment Website Dismisses Her

Keke Palmer laments how Kylie Jenner gave into pressure in a new interview. (Screenshot)

When an entertainment website failed to mention Keke Palmer by name, many fans raced to correct it with meme-filled results.

Media news website Insider covered Palmer’s comments about the way society has seemed to affect Kylie Jenner’s perception of herself.

“In the situation with Kylie, where you’ve had a young girl [who] people have seen on television since she was a kid and they literally told her she was so ugly… the ugly person in the family.” Palmer said to Yahoo Beauty when discussing how to remain true to yourself. “She went and did apparently everything the world deems as beautiful. The even crazier part is that everybody loves her for it.”

When Insider tweeted the article, they wrote, “An actress slams Kylie Jenner for not being true to herself and teaching girls the wrong lessons about success.”

Twitter users swiftly swooped in to check them and while Insider removed the tweet as a result of the backlash, the article remains published with the same headline.

https://twitter.com/Keez_Kezia_Amos/status/890858356767727617

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top