Atlanta is Building Less Affordable Housing Than Any Other Major City

While Atlanta certainly isn’t alone among U.S. cities that are undergoing a boom in the growth of expensive housing, it does rank at the top among cities that are developing almost no new affordable and low-income apartments. Luxury-priced apartments dominate the market.

It’s that dominance that matters. Nearly all of the new apartments built in the city in the past couple of years have been in luxury buildings.

That means the share of overall housing that’s available for middle-to-low income people is shrinking. Georgia Tech professor Dan Immergluck was recently quoted as saying: “There’s essentially no new low-income housing development. There’s also very little for moderate-income folks, and so there’s this mismatch.”

The desire for homes in the city near transit and bike lanes and parks is not being met in a way that accommodates the full range of income groups. The new examples of good urbanism in Atlanta — homes in compact forms near MARTA stations and with decent pedestrian infrastructure — are largely exclusive to the wealthier residents.

The Atlanta Belt-Line’s Promise of Affordability

One of the most concerning aspects of this mismatch: even the Atlanta BeltLine is failing to come through for the city. It was supposed to have provided its neighborhoods with “2,800 units affordable to those earning a teacher’s salary” by now according to a piece in Saporta Report.

But it has only produced 570 units to date, and some of those have already risen in price since they hit the market. There’s even debate about how affordable some were to begin with.

Here’s how important the issue is: Ryan Gravel, the visionary behind the creation of the BeltLine, was recently named a Streetsblog hero of 2016 after abruptly resigning from the board of the organization charged with raising money for the project: “Gravel said his resignation was necessary to highlight the rising rents resulting from the project and advocate for more robust solutions for people at risk of being displaced.” Nathaniel Smith, founder of the Partnership for Southern Equity, resigned from the board for the same reason.

Luxury Homes for Some, Evictions for Others:Inequality Is High

What makes this dominance of luxury and dearth of affordability so striking in Atlanta is that it is, according to multiple reports, one of the most “unequal” among large U.S. cities when it comes to wealth gap. Atlanta is also segregated geographically along lines of wealth and class, and even health.

A study from 2013 found Atlanta to have the lowest level of income mobility in the U.S., giving children living in poverty the worst chance of rising out of it among any large city nationally. Because of the spatial nature of these gaps in wealth and opportunity, new luxury apartments are going up in geographic bubbles that serve to further exacerbate an already significant divide between classes.

Meanwhile, instead of getting new homes and new investment, the less-privileged communities of Atlanta are currently experiencing a phenomenally high number of evictions, a crisis that’s hitting Black neighborhoods the hardest. And the vacuum of high-quality affordable rentals is sustaining a market for the ones that slumlords provide.

Don’t Dismiss This

I’ve noticed a tendency among some to treat the luxury housing boom in Atlanta as something that doesn’t deserve crisis-level priority, as though it’s simply an inevitable part of national trends.

But Atlanta has a particularly troubling set of problems related to inequality and housing, making this much more than a story about the local effects of national real estate trends. We shouldn’t dismiss this issue as such. Atlanta is arguably the U.S. city (among large ones) that can least afford to be at the top of the list for dominance in luxury-housing growth.

——————————————————————————————————

Darin Givens is co-founder of ThreadATL, an urbanism advocacy group in Atlanta.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top