Usher’s Herpes Diagnosis Now a Matter of Public Record As Court Documents Showing $1.1M Payout Come to Light

Usher is worth a reported $180 million. (Erika Goldring/Getty Images)

A new report has uncovered details about a $1.1 million payout Usher gave a stylist after he allegedly knowingly infected her with herpes.

In a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court and settled in 2012, Usher learned he had the virus in 2009 or 2010, according to Radar Online. Doctors labeled the singer as an “asymptomatic carrier” after he experienced no other symptoms aside from a “greenish discharge” that once came from his penis, according to court papers. (According to the CDC, a smelly discharge can be a symptom of genital herpes.)

Documents also revealed that the singer learned about his infection after he began dating the woman, whose identity has been withheld by Radar Online, and Usher “consciously and purposefully withheld that information from her and continued to have unprotected sex with her.”

When Usher’s partner confronted him about the infection, which California law states it is illegal to knowingly and recklessly transmit, he was “very apologetic” and said “he would take care of things,” which the documents show included paying $2,754 in medical bills for the woman, according to the New York Daily News.

Usher later called the woman with his doctor, who told her that Usher was diagnosed with the virus, Radar Online reported. The stylist tested positive for genital herpes two or three days after speaking with Usher’s doctor, which left her “devastated.”

“She feels that her health and body have been ruined,” according to the lawsuit, and she “has suffered severe emotional distress and has been extremely depressed … knowing there is no cure.”

Usher has not issued a public comment on the matter.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top